Category Archives: Compliance

New Season, New Controls, New Sanctions: New CCL Chem/Bio Controls, Firearms FAQs & Treasury Implements Caesar Act Sanctions Against Syria

In our last post, we covered a series of breaking developments in export compliance towards China and Hong Kong.  While those developments have received a lot of attention, summer has brought us even more export compliance updates.

New CCL Chem/Bio Controls

On June 17, 2020, the Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) published a final rule (85 FR 36483) to amend Commerce Control List (CCL) Export Control Classification Numbers (ECCNs) 1C350, 1C351 and 2B352.  These changes implement decisions by the Australia Group by adding a list of precursor chemicals and mixtures to 1C350, Middle East respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus (MERS-related coronavirus) to 1C351, and a technical note to 2B352 (Equipment capable of use in handling biological materials) that indicates 2B352.b.2.b includes single-use cultivation chambers with rigid walls.  Related technology would be controlled in the relevant ECCNs.

The Australia Group is a forum of 43 countries which seek to harmonize export controls related to chemical and biological weapons.

BIS Issues Firearms FAQs

BIS recently posted a series of FAQs on firearms and related items moved from the United States Munitions List (USML) to the CCL in March.  The document, dated January 23, 2020 was published on the BIS website on July 7, 2020 and contains 62 pages of FAQs and other guidance on the transition.

Treasury Implements Caesar Act Sanctions

Also on June 17, 2020, the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned the first set of individuals and entities under the Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act of 2019 (the Caesar Act).  Named for a Syrian photographer who documented torture in the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, the Caesar Act targets “foreign persons who facilitate the Assad regime’s acquisition of goods, services, or technologies that support the regime’s military activities as well as its aviation and oil and gas production industries.”

Executive Order Establishes ICC Sanctions

On June 11, 2020, the President issued Executive Order 13928, “Blocking Property of Certain Persons Associated with the International Criminal Court.”  This executive order is a response to assertions of jurisdiction over U.S. and allied personnel by the International Criminal Court (ICC), countries which are “are not parties to the Rome Statute or have not otherwise consented to ICC jurisdiction.”  This is the latest stage of a conflict that dates back the establishment of the ICC and 2002’s American Service-Members’ Protection Act.  The Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury and the Attorney General may sanction ICC personnel under this executive order, who would then be included on the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) and subject to a series of financial sanctions.  No individuals or entities have yet been sanctioned under this order.

CFIUS Proposes Export License Requirement as Filing Threshold

On May 21, 2020, the Department of Treasury published a proposed rule (85 FR 30893) which would notably revise the category of business acquisitions subject to mandatory Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) review.  The proposed revision establish mandatory review of acquisitions and some non-controlling investments when an export license would be required to release a company’s technology to the relevant foreign parties.  Relevant export licenses are defined under “U.S. regulatory authorization” to include:

(a) A license or other approval issued by the Department of State under the ITAR;

(b) A license from the Department of Commerce under the EAR;

(c) A specific or general authorization from the Department of Energy under the regulations governing assistance to foreign atomic energy activities at 10 CFR part 810 other than the general authorization described in 10 CFR 810.6(a); or

(d) A specific license from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission under the regulations governing the export or import of nuclear equipment and material at 10 CFR part 110.

Previously, CFIUS had published a list of North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes identifying businesses subject to this requirement.  The proposed revision would replace that list with the export licensing threshold.  Comments were accepted through June 22, 2020 and a final rule has not yet been published.

OFAC Issues “Syria-Related” Sanctions Regulations, Targeting Turkey

On June 5, 2020, the Department of Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), published a final rule (85 FR 34510) establishing the Syria-Related Sanctions Regulations (31 CFR Part 569), which implement Executive Order 13894.  The new regulations are in addition to OFAC’s existing Syria Sanctions Regulations (31 CFR Part 542).

Although titled “Syria-Related Sanctions,” the sanctions regulations are targeted at Turkish entities involved in the Turkish military offensive in northern Syria.  The criteria for listing includes (among others) Turkish government officials and agencies and persons operating in targeted sectors of the Turkish economy determined by the Secretary of the Treasury to be contributing to various destabilizing activities or human rights abuses in relation to Syria.

The current notice does not create any newly sanctioned parties, but implements Executive Order 13894 and provides the criteria for the Secretary of Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, to make these designations.  Sanctions include blocked property and other related financial sanctions.

OFAC’s Syria-Related Sanctions page includes additional information on the new rule, including information previously published regarding Executive Order 13894 (October 14, 2019).  Executive Order 13894 was used to briefly add the Turkish Ministry of National Defence, the Turkish Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources, and three senior Turkish government officials to OFAC’s Specially Designated Nationals List (SDN List).

The issuance of the Syria-Related Sanctions Regulations provide a valuable reminder that sanctions programs affect transactions beyond the obvious countries of concern.  Raising similar issues a few days earlier, three companies and vessels from the Marshall Islands and one company and vessel from Greece were listed under OFAC’s Venezuela-Related sanctions program.  Denied party screening for all countries is a must-do to prevent serious compliance problems.

Compliance in a Pandemic – Updates from DDTC and OFAC

DDTC Adjusts to Social Distancing

As we noted recently on this blog, the Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) remains open, but will be making adjustments in response to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.  This includes an electronic process for submitting disclosures to the office of Defense Trade Controls Compliance (DTCC).

Since that announcement, DDTC has:

  • Cancelled its Wednesday, April 29 In-House Seminar
  • Suspended pick-up/drop off courier services while continuing to send and accept U.S. mail
  • Indicated that it is considering a one-time temporary reduction in registration fees for “certain categories of DDTC registrants”
  • Implemented procedures to send DSP-85 and General Correspondence (GC) responses by email when possible
  • Began accepting FMS Part 130 reports via email at DDTC-Part130Notices@state.gov
  • Moved to electronic submissions of Congressional Notifications.

DDTC has also provided extensions as follows:

  • Temporarily extended ITAR registrations expiring on February 29 through June 30, 2020 for two months from the original date of expiration
  • Extended licenses expiring “between March 13, 2020 and May 31, 2020 for six (6) months from the original date of expiration”
  • Granted an additional 30 days for responses to request-for-information letters related to DTCC disclosures.

Finally, DDTC made the following announcements to address remote working and expedited licenses:

  • Suspended “the requirement that a regular employee, for purposes of ITAR § 120.39(a)(2), work at the company’s facilities, to allow the individual to work at a remote work location, so long as the individual is not located in Russia or a country listed in ITAR § 126.1” through July 31, 2020.
  • Suspended a similar requirement for regular employees of licensed entities working under a TAA, MLA, or exemption.
  • Reissued guidance for requests submitted in support of U.S. Operations (USOP) (exports in support of U.S. and coalition forces that are deployed or scheduled to be deployed within 90 days).

Please monitor the DDTC website for additional announcements.

OFAC Publishes Pandemic Guidance

On April 20, 2020, the Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC) released a statement on compliance concerns during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The announcement addresses exemptions and authorizations that allow humanitarian assistance to countries subject to OFAC sanctions.  It specifically addresses the Iran, Venezuela, North Korea, Syria, Cuba, and Ukraine/Russia sanctions programs.

OFAC also requests anyone affected by the pandemic to contact OFAC as soon as practicable if delays associated with OFAC’s regulatory requirements (e.g., various reporting requirements and responding to administrative subpoenas).

OFAC has also established an e-mail account for electronic submission of disclosures at OFACdisclosures@treasury.gov.  OFAC has previously published specific guidance on how to organize and submit electronic correspondence.

Finally, OFAC acknowledged that the pandemic “can cause technical and resource challenges for organizations” that will be evaluated as a factor in potential violations on a case-by-case basis.

Compliance During the Pandemic – ECS Can Help

The U.S. government offices are making efforts to alleviate some difficulties in dealing with them, but this is not an excuse to ignore export compliance.  Enforcement may be hampered now, but any compliance problems left to fester are just going to get worse for when they are back to “normal.”

We continue to offer training, with live streaming two-day seminars and an eight-part webinar series currently in progress.  Click here for more on ECS training options.

Our consulting practice continues to operate remotely and can assist with license drafting and review, Technical Assistance Agreements (TAAs), product classifications, risk assessments, and any other assistance you may need to keep your compliance program in order and business moving along.

Four Cs of Export Compliance Updates – COVID-19, Cloud, Country Groups, and CFIUS

DDTC Open and Accepting Electronic Disclosures

On March 9, 2020, the Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) announced that it remains open, but will be making staffing and other adjustments in response to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

Electronic licensing and registration processes are operating as normal, but may be subject to additional processing delays.  The same applies to Commodity Jurisdiction (CJ) and General Correspondence (GC) requests.

Most notable, disclosures submitted pursuant to ITAR §127.12 may now be submitted by email.  Disclosures and related information should be emailed in pdf format on company letterhead to DTCC-CaseStatus@state.gov.  Duplicate hard copies are not required, but hard copies may continue to be submitted if necessary.

Please monitor the DDTC website for additional announcements.

ITAR Cloud Rule Almost Here

The new International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) cloud rule is scheduled to go into effect March 25, 2020.  DDTC has release a two-page pdf handout summarizing the changes.

Commerce Changes Country Groups for Russia and Yemen

On February 24, 2020, the Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) published a rule (85 FR 10274) revising the Country Chart and Country Groups for Russia and Yemen in the Export Administration Regulations (EAR).  A subsequent rule (85 FR 13009) made a minor correction.

The rule removes Russia from more favorable treatment under Country Groups A:2 (Missile Technology Control Regime) and A:4 (Nuclear Suppliers Group) and adds it to Country Groups D:2 and D:4 to reflect nuclear and missile technology proliferation concerns.  It also adds an “X” in the “NP 1” column of the Commerce Country Chart for Russia, establishing a license requirement for items controlled for those purposes.

The rule removes Yemen from more favorable treatment under Country Group B and adds it to Country Group D:1 based on national security concerns.

Under these changes, certain license exceptions are no longer available for Russia and Yemen.  For transactions that would previously have been authorized under a license exception, a BIS license will be required (exports, reexports, and transfers of certain controlled items).

CFIUS Filing Fees Proposed

On March 9, 2020 (85 FR 13586, corrected in 85 FR 14837), the Department of the Treasury issued a proposed rule to establish a filing fee for voluntary notices submitted for by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS).  The Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act of 2018 (FIRRMA) provided for, but did not immediately require, filing fees.

The proposed rule adds implementing regulations including the following fee schedule:

  • $750 for transactions valued at greater than $500,000 but less than $5,000,000;
  • $7,500 for transactions valued at equal to or greater than $5,000,000 but less than $50,000,000;
  • $75,000 for transactions valued at equal to or greater than $50,000,000 but less than $250,000,000;
  • $150,000 for transactions valued at equal to or greater than $250,000,000 but less than $750,000,000; and
  • $300,000 for transactions valued at equal to or greater than $750,000,000.

Comments will be accepted through April 3, 2020.  Refer to the original Federal Register Notice for more information and how to comment.

ECS Working Remotely Since 2003

While events have turned our next scheduled seminar from on-site in Park City, Utah to on-site on your computers nationwide, ECS remains available to assist with your export compliance needs.  Contact us today and keep your business moving despite recent disruptions.

Commerce Proposes CFIUS-like Review for ICTS Supply Chain Transactions

On November 27, 2019, the Department of Commerce published a notice (84 FR 65316) proposing new regulations on Information and Communications Technology and Services (ICTS) supply chain transactions with “foreign adversaries”  The proposal would add 15 CFR Part 7 to implement Executive Order 13873 of May 15, 2019.  The executive order had directed the Commerce Department to come up with regulations under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

In the proposal, “transaction” is are defined broadly as:

any acquisition, importation, transfer, installation, dealing in, or use of any information and communications technology or service.

“Information and Communications Technology and Services (ICTS)” are defined as:

any hardware, software, or other product or service primarily intended to fulfill or enable the function of information or data processing, storage, retrieval, or communication by electronic means, including through transmission, storage, or display.

The proposal does not specifically identify “foreign adversaries” but these will be determined by the Secretary of Commerce.

Foreign adversary means any foreign government or foreign non-government person determined by the Secretary to have engaged in a long-term pattern or serious instances of conduct significantly adverse to the national security of the United States or security and safety of United States persons for the purposes of Executive Order 13783.

It is anticipated that foreign adversaries could include parties on the Entity List such as Huawei.

The review of transactions would begin at the discretion of the US government, including when based on credible information from private parties.  Unlike the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), the Commerce Department’s review does not include an approval process and specifically excludes issuing advisory opinions and declaratory rulings.

Potentially prohibited transactions include those where:

The transaction involves information and communications technology or services designed, developed, manufactured, or supplied, by persons owned by, controlled by, or subject to the jurisdiction or direction of a foreign adversary; and

(i) Poses an undue risk of sabotage to or subversion of the design, integrity, manufacturing, production, distribution, installation, operation, or maintenance of information and communications technology or services in the United States;

(ii) Poses an undue risk of catastrophic effects on the security or resiliency of United States critical infrastructure or the digital economy of the United States; or

(iii) Otherwise poses an unacceptable risk to the national security of the United States or the security and safety of United States Persons.

ICTS transactions with foreign adversaries may be subject to mitigation, prohibition, or unwinding.

Violations (including misrepresentation and concealment of material facts) may be subject to civil penalties of up to $302,584 (as adjusted annually for inflation).

The Department of Commerce specifically requests comments on the following areas:

  • Categories of transactions or persons that would never be prohibited under the EO;
  • Types of transactions that may be prohibited, but where risks can be mitigated;
  • The proposed definition of “transaction”; and
  • Recordkeeping requirements.

Comments may be submitted through December 27, 2019.  Review the Federal Register Notice for the full proposed rule and how to submit comments.  Detailed comments and proposed revisions may be particularly helpful in completing the final rule.

Check out the Updated ECScreening.com

Always working to improve on crucial services like denied party screening, ECScreening, ECS’s Denied Party Screening solution for small and medium-sized companies has recently rolled out a series of updates for an improved user interface.  Based on user feedback, we have revised the appearance and functionality of the site, including updates to:

  • Main Menu Task Bar
  • Helpful FAQs
  • Blog: the Denied Party Digest
  • Quick access menu

The quick access menu displays all research options at the top of appropriate pages.

Importantly, we’ve expanded service for commercial and enterprise users: Recurring Search no longer has any record limits!

Denied party lists are constantly changing and apply worldwide.  Recurring Search eases the burden of keeping up with these changes.  For example, when changes to the SDN (Specially Designated Nationals) List and/or Entity List occur, like the ones below, Recurring Search keeps your business from missing these changes because your searches are continuously screened:

  • November 18, 2019 – nine new SDNs from Turkey, Kuwait, Afghanistan, and Syria;
  • November 13, 2019 – twenty-two entities from Bahrain, France, Iran, Jordan, Lebanon, Oman, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Syria, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, and the United Kingdom added to the Entity List plus one modification and three removals;
  • November 7, 2019 – four new SDNs from Nicaragua and Mali;
  • November 5, 2019 – five new SDNs from Venezuela;
  • October 11, 2019 – eight new SDNs from South Sudan, United Kingdom, Kenya, and the United Arab Emirates;
  • October 10, 2019 – four new SDNs and two updates in South Africa, Iran, and the United Arab Emirates;
  • October 9, 2019 – twenty-eight Chinese entities added to the Entity List; and
  • September 30, 2019 – five new SDNs from Russia, Seychelles, and the Czech Republic, plus one vessel, three aircraft, and seven other updates.

Check out ECScreening.com and contact us for a 7 day free trial coupon.

Chinese Telecom Giant Huawei added to Entity List: What You Need to Know Now

On Wednesday, May 15, 2019, the Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) announced the addition of Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd., a Chinese telecommunications and electronics manufacturing giant, to the Entity List.  A Federal Register Notice (84 FR 22961) followed on Tuesday, May 21, 2019.

What is the Entity List?

The Entity List is one of many U.S. Government lists that restricts business dealings with individuals, companies, and other entities worldwide.

As described by BIS:

Additions to the Entity List are decided by the End-User Review Committee which is comprised of officials from the Department of Commerce, Department of Defense, State Department, and Department of Energy. Under § 744.11(b) of the Export Administration Regulations, persons or organizations for whom there is reasonable cause to believe that they are involved, were involved, or pose a significant risk of becoming involved in activities that are contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States, and those acting on behalf of such persons, may be added to the Entity List.

Why was Huawei Listed?

Huawei’s listing was based on BIS’s conclusion that “Huawei is engaged in activities that are contrary to U.S. national security or foreign policy interest” and includes 68 non-US affiliates in 26 countries (Belgium, Bolivia, Brazil, Burma, Canada, Chile, China, Egypt, Germany, Hong Kong, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Lebanon, Madagascar, Netherlands, Oman, Pakistan, Paraguay, Qatar, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Switzerland, Taiwan, United Kingdom, and Vietnam).

What does the Listing Establish?

The listing creates a license requirement with a presumption of denial for items subject to the EAR (including EAR99 or other items that would otherwise be shipped No License Required, or NLR).

The listing was followed by the announcement of a temporary General License that creates a limited 90-day reprieve from May 20, 2019 to August 19, 2019.  During this time, some transactions are authorized when relating to supporting existing networks, supporting existing handsets, and cybersecurity research and vulnerability disclosure, and 5G standards development.

The General License and any subsequent publications should be reviewed closely for their applicability to any transaction.  Use of the General License also requires a certification statement.

Best Practice – Screen Your Customers and Suppliers

The Entity List as well as other government lists are continuously updated.  To ensure compliance, all parties should be screened regularly, using software such as ECS’s own ECScreening.

SUBMIT YOUR ADVISORY OPINIONS ON-LINE TO DDTC! REVIEW AND MAKE COMMENTS ON THE NEW CJ FORM

Advisory Opinions Accepted Online Through DECCS

Following last year’s testing, the Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) has announced the release of their new Advisory Opinions application for DDTC’s cloud-based Defense Export Control and Compliance System (DECCS).

The new Advisory Opinions application covers the following ITAR requests:

  • 126.9(a) – Whether DDTC would likely grant approval for a particular defense article or service to a particular country.*
  • 126.9(c) – ITAR interpretation
  • 129.9 – Guidance on whether an activity constitutes brokering under Part 129.

*Note that in many cases, it is preferable to submit a DSP-5 technical data license for marketing a defense article rather than a General Correspondence Advisory Opinion request.  While the new application is intended improve the submission and review process, a DSP-5 can avoid the need for two separate submissions for the same activity. (See DDTC’s 2016 guidance on advisory opinions.)

Other General Correspondence requests, such as §123.9 reexports or retransfers are still submitted in hard copy by mail.

The new application can be found at the DECCS Industry Service Portal: https://deccspmddtc.service-now.com/deccs

See the DDTC News & Events page (02/04/2019) for more information on this release.

Comment on Commodity Jurisdiction Form

In related DECCS news, on February 6, 2019, DDTC published a notice (84 FR 2295) requesting comments on the DS-4076 Request for Commodity Jurisdiction Determination form.  This request is part of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval process.

Comments may be submitted until April 8, 2019.  Please see the Federal Register Notice for additional details.

Comment on DDTC Registration Form

On February 13, 2019, DDTC published a notice (84 FR 3846) requesting comments on the DS-2032 Statement of Registration form.  This request is also part of the OMB approval process.  Notably, DDTC plans to remove the fields for Social Security Numbers and home addresses for the various senior officers listed on the form.

Comments may be submitted until March 15, 2019.  Please see the Federal Register Notice for additional details.

CFIUS EXTENDS LONG ARM TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF DEFENSE ARTICLES/ DEFENSE SERVICES ON THE USML

As anticipated following the August enactment of the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act of 2018 (FIRRMA), the Department of the Treasury has issued new regulations implementing changes to the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS).

CFIUS Amendments

The first, an interim rule issued October 11, 2018 (83 FR 51316), primarily makes technical amendments to the CFIUS Part 800 regulations.  These changes include:

  • Extending CFIUS review period from 30 to 45 days,
  • Revising various definitions to be consistent with FIRRMA,
  • Providing examples of covered transactions,
  • Implementing electronic submissions,
  • Allowing parties to stipulate that a transaction is a covered transaction, and
  • Revising language regarding violations and remedies.

This rule was effective immediately and comments may be submitted through November 10, 2018.  Please see the Federal Register Notice for more information on how to comment.

Pilot Program

The second notice, also issued on October 11, 2018 (83 FR 51322) implements a “pilot program” expanding CFIUS review and mandatory declarations to a specific list of covered industries when dealing with “critical technologies.”

Under the new rule, “critical technologies” include:

  • Defense articles or defense services included on the United States Munitions List (USML) controlled by the Department of State,
  • Commerce Control List (CCL) items controlled pursuant to multilateral regimes, for regional stability, or surreptitious listening by the Department of Commerce,
  • Nuclear equipment and technology controlled by the Department of Energy,
  • Nuclear facilities, equipment, and material controlled by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and
  • Select agents and toxins controlled by the Department of Agriculture or the Department of Health and Human Services.

Companies in or developing products for the industries listed in the new Annex A to Part 801 are covered by the pilot program as follows, including North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes:

Industry NAICS Code
Aircraft Manufacturing 336411
Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing 336412
Alumina Refining and Primary Aluminum Production 331313
Ball and Roller Bearing Manufacturing 332991
Computer Storage Device Manufacturing 334112
Electronic Computer Manufacturing 334111
Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing 336414
Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Propulsion Unit and Propulsion Unit Parts Manufacturing 336415
Military Armored Vehicle, Tank, and Tank Component Manufacturing 336992
Nuclear Electric Power Generation 221113
Optical Instrument and Lens Manufacturing 333314
Other Basic Inorganic Chemical Manufacturing 325180
Other Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing 336419
Petrochemical Manufacturing 325110
Powder Metallurgy Part Manufacturing 332117
Power, Distribution, and Specialty Transformer Manufacturing 335311
Primary Battery Manufacturing 335912
Radio and Television Broadcasting and Wireless Communications Equipment Manufacturing 334220
Research and Development in Nanotechnology 541713
Research and Development in Biotechnology (except Nanobiotechnology) 541714
Secondary Smelting and Alloying of Aluminum 331314
Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing 334511
Semiconductor and Related Device Manufacturing 334413
Semiconductor Machinery Manufacturing 333242
Storage Battery Manufacturing 335911
Telephone Apparatus Manufacturing 334210
Turbine and Turbine Generator Set Units Manufacturing 333611

Transactions in these areas are covered by the pilot program when the investment would give a foreign investor:

  • Access to material nonpublic technical information;
  • Membership, observer, or nomination rights on the board of directors; or
  • Involvement in substantive decision-making regarding critical technology.

This rule will take effect on November 10, 2018 and comments may be submitted through that date.  Please see the Federal Register Notice for more information on how to comment.

The Department of the Treasury has also published a press release and fact sheet that summarize these changes.

The pilot program is scheduled to end no later than March 5, 2020, once replaced by a full expansion of CFIUS review.

“U.S. Persons” Include More Than Just Citizens

What is a “U.S. Person”?  If you are hiring for ITAR-controlled programs, you need to know.

The U.S. Department of Justice recently settled a hiring discrimination investigation against a large international law firm, Clifford Chance US LLP:

The Department’s investigation determined that Clifford Chance’s unlawful practice of excluding otherwise qualified non-U.S. citizens and dual U.S. citizens from the document reviewer positions was based on the law firm’s misunderstanding of the requirements of the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR). The Department found that the law firm improperly terminated or removed three individuals from their positions based on their citizenship status.

The settlement includes a $132,000 civil penalty, lost wages, compliance training, and two years of monitoring and reporting.

The problem for Clifford Chance was that the ITAR does not require that export-controlled projects be restricted to US citizens in order to avoid unauthorized exports.

The ITAR definition of a “U.S. person,” to which a release of technical data is not an export, is:

§120.15 U.S. person.
U.S. person means a person (as defined in §120.14 of this part) who is a lawful permanent resident as defined by 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(20) or who is a protected individual as defined by 8 U.S.C. 1324b(a)(3). It also means any corporation, business association, partnership, society, trust, or any other entity, organization or group that is incorporated to do business in the United States. It also includes any governmental (federal, state or local) entity. It does not include any foreign person as defined in §120.16 of this part.

For individuals, including the categories in 8 U.S.C. 1324b(a)(3), U.S. persons include:

  1. US Citizens
  2. Lawful permanent residents (i.e., Green Card holders)
  3. Other narrow categories including some refugees and asylees.

Coming at it from the other side, foreign persons are defined as the inverse of US persons:

§120.16 Foreign person.
Foreign person means any natural person who is not a lawful permanent resident as defined by 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(20) or who is not a protected individual as defined by 8 U.S.C. 1324b(a)(3). It also means any foreign corporation, business association, partnership, trust, society or any other entity or group that is not incorporated or organized to do business in the United States, as well as international organizations, foreign governments and any agency or subdivision of foreign governments (e.g., diplomatic missions).

While ITAR § 120.17(a)(2) defines releasing technician data to a foreign person in the United States as a deemed export, dual U.S. citizens and permanent residents (as well as other “protected individuals”) are not foreign persons.  As U.S. persons, they would not require export authorization and should not be categorically excluded.

The Export Administration Regulations (EAR) use the same basic definitions of U.S. and foreign persons for the purposes of deemed exports (see § 734.13(a)(2) for deemed exports and Part 772 for definitions).

So next time your company has an ITAR or EAR-related job listing, keep this case in mind.  Misunderstanding the category of “U.S. persons” could lead to steep penalties and time-consuming training.